The economics of status, institutional design and economic policy
Abstract
This article systemizes the newest research results in the contemporary field of the economic analysis of social status related to the formation of effective institutions and economic policies. The psychological effect of adaptation to the current consumption levels and the prevailing importance of relative to absolute wealth reveal the possibility to explain and forecast human behavior in a rationalistic economic perspective in situations that are usually studied in sociology. Taking into account the effects of the competition for status allows a more thorough and realistic analysis of the forms of socioeconomic organization, the implications of planned economic policies and the role of existing institutional structures for the subjective wellbeing of a society’s members.
Keywords
JEL Classification
References
Канеман, Д. (2012). Мисленето. С.: „Изток-Запад“ (превод от D. Kahneman. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan, 2011).
Попов, Т., Т. Седларски (2012), Институционална икономика. Възможности и неизползван потенциал. С.: УИ „Св. Климент Охридски“.
Седларски, Т. (2014a). Социалнопсихологически аспекти на пазарната размяна в институционалната икономика. - Икономическа мисъл, 1/2014, с.95-114.
Седларски, Т. (2014b). Интегриране на социалния статус в икономическата теория: статусната икономика на Робърт Франк. - Икономически и социални алтернативи, 4, с.117-134.
Седларски, Т. (2013). Нова институционална икономика. С.: УИ „Св. Климент Охридски“.
Седларски, Т. (2011). Несвободното възникване на свободния пазар - 'Великата трансформация' на Карл Полани. - Икономическа мисъл, 1, с. 51-72.
Седларски, Т., Ж. Панайотов (2015). Изплъзващата се цел на щастието. – В: Годишник на СУ „Св. Климент Охридски”, Стопански факултет, Т. 13 (под печат).
Фукуяма, Ф. (2006 [1992]). Краят на историята и последният човек. С.: „Обсидиан”.
Akerlof, G. A., R. E. Kranton (2005). Identity and the Economics of Organizations. - Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), p. 9-32.
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of Social Cost. - Journal of Law and Economics, 3(15), p. 1-44.
Cole, H. L., G. J., Mailath, A. Postlewaite (1992), Social norms, savings behavior, and growth. - Journal of Political Economy 100, p.1092-1125.
Frank, R. H. (2011). The Darwin Economy: Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good. Princeton University Press.
Frank, R. H. (2004). Human Nature and Economic Policy: Lessons for the Transition Economies. - Journal of Socio-economics, 33, p. 679-694.
Frank, R. H. (1997). The Frame of Reference as a Public Good. - The Economic Journal, Vol. 107, N 445, (Nov.), p.1832-1847.
Frank, R. H. (1991). Positional Externalities. – In: Richard Zeckhauser (ed.).
Strategy and Choice: Essays in Honor of Thomas C. Schelling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, р. 25-47.
Frank, R. H. (1989). Frames of Reference and the Quality of Life. - American Economic Review, 79, Papers and Proceedings, May, p. 80-85.
Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hirsch, F. (1976). The Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Changein 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Layard, R. (1980). Human Satisfactions and Public Policy. - The Economic Journal, 90(360), p. 737-750.
Polanyi, K. (1997 [1944]) The Great Transformation. Politische und ökonomische Ursprünge von Gesellschaften und Wirtschaftssystemen. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Postlewaite, A. (1998). Social Status, Norms and Economic Performances: The Social Basis of Interdependent Preferences. - European Economic Review, Elsevier, Vol. 42(3-5), p.779-800.
Scitovsky, T. (1976). The Joyless Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1983). Poor, Relatively Speaking. - Oxford Economics Papers, July, 35, p.153-167.
Thurow, L. (1980). The Zero Sum Society. New York: Basic Books.
Townsend, P. (1979). The Development of Research on Poverty. - In: Social Security Research: The Definition and Measurement of Povert., Dept. of Health and Social Research. London: HMSO.